wildlife100

This page last updated: 05/19/2011
Metadata created using Minnesota Geographic Metadata Guidelines


Go to Section:
1. Overview
2. Data Quality
3. Data Organization
4. Coordinate System
5. Attributes
6. Distribution - Get Data
7. Metadata Reference

Section 1 Overview
Originator Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources
Title wildlife100
Abstract This data layer represents a general score for wildlife habitat quality on a 0-100 point scale, 100 being the highest risk. Larger values indicate higher potential wildlife habitat quality.
The habitat mapping used in this plan was updated from the work done as part of Minnesota's Statewide Conservation and Preservation Plan. The primary goal of habitat mapping was to collate the available information for Minnesota that can be used to prioritize important areas for conservation (protection, acquisition, restoration) by integrating both positive (resources) and negative (threats to resources) information on biodiversity, habitat quality, outdoor recreation (e.g., hunting and fishing), and water quality. Positive components included features such as known occurrences of rare species, sites of biodiversity significance, or high levels of game species abundance, while negative components included the dominant drivers of environmental change as identified in Phase I of the plan. Negative influences on natural resources included such information as human development, land use, and road density. By acquiring and objectively processing information related to these components, it was possible to rank areas in Minnesota according to their conservation priority.
Purpose This layer is one portion of an Environmental Benefits Index with the original intention to rank CRP and other critical lands on multiple ecological benefits simultaneously.
Time Period of Content Date 05/19/2011
Currentness Reference
Progress Complete
Maintenance and Update Frequency None Planned
Spatial Extent of Data
Bounding Coordinates -97.312865
-89.353296
49.428618
43.407729
Place Keywords Minnesota
Theme Keywords
Theme Keyword Thesaurus
Access Constraints
Use Constraints
Contact Person Information Aaron Spence, GIS specialist
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources

St. Paul, MN 
Phone: 651.296.0660
Email: aaron.spence@state.mn.us
Browse Graphic None available
Associated Data Sets EBI300, waterqual100, watererosion100

Section 2 Data Quality
Attribute Accuracy
Logical Consistency
Completeness Statewide
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
Lineage Table 1. Input datasets and weightings for terrestrial habitat analyses.
Input Weighting Description
Sites of Biodiversity Significance 33
A multi-faceted assessment of this land for its importance from a regional perspective in terms of biodiversity and ecosystem function. Higher values indicate higher biodiversity significance.
MN DNR GAP terrestrial vertebrate models - Game species 7 The number of game species for which this land may be habitat. Higher values indicate higher numbers of game species potentially using this land.
MN DNR GAP terrestrial vertebrate SGCN models 10 The number of Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) for which this land may be habitat. Higher values indicate higher numbers of SGCN species potentially using this land.
Bird potential habitat models -- USFWS 9
Probable number of bird species (from a set of 17) using this land. Higher values indicate more of these 17 species using this land.
MN DNR GAP Habitat by protection level 8 Number of terrestrial vertebrate species potentially using this land weighted by the current level of habitat protection statewide for each species. Higher values indicate more species potentially using this land, weighted as described.
Wildland Urban Interface 6 Wildland Urban Interface maps initial encroachment of development into areas of largely intact natural cover. Decisions made here determine whether natural areas are preserved or pressured. Higher values indicate land classified as Wildland Urban Interface, this is a binary yes / no input.
Wildland Urban Intermix 5 Wildland Urban Intermix map intermixing of development and significant natural cover. Connectivity can be maintained or lost by decisions made in these areas. Higher values indicate land classified as Wildland Urban Intermix, this is a binary yes / no input.
CRP lands 5
Lands enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program, USDA.
Road density 5 A measure of the density of roads within the township. Major roads receive a higher weighting. Higher values indicate higher density of roads in the township.
Housing density 2000 4 Housing density from census data (census blocks) for 2000 for this land. Higher values indicate higher housing density.
Projected housing density 2030 4 Projected housing density by census blocks for 2030 for this land. Higher values indicate higher projected housing density.
Housing density change 2000 to 2030 5 Projected change in housing density by census blocks for 2000 to 2030 for this land. Higher values indicate higher housing density increase.

Section 3 Spatial Data Organization (not used in this metadata)

Section 4 Coordinate System
Horizontal Coordinate Scheme
Horizontal Datum NAD83
Horizontal Units Meters
Cell Width 30.000000
Cell Height 30.000000

Section 5 Attributes
Overview
Detailed Citation
Table Detail:
wildlife100.vat
Field NameValid ValuesDefinitionDefinition Source
Rowid
-
Internal feature number.ESRI
VALUE
-
COUNT
-


Section 6 Distribution
Publisher Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources
Publication Date
Contact Person Information Aaron Spence, GIS Specialist
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources

St. Paul, MN 
Phone:
Email: aaron.spence@state.mn.us
Distributor's Data Set Identifier Downloadable Data
Distribution Liability THE GIS DATA ARE PROVIDED TO YOU AS IS AND WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY AS TO THEIR PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. The Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources does not represent or warrant that the GIS Data or the data documentation are error-free, complete, current, or accurate. You are responsible for any consequences resulting from your use of the GIS Data or your reliance on the GIS Data. You should consult the data documentation for this particular GIS Data to determine the limitations of the GIS Data and the precision with which the GIS Data may depict distance, direction, location, or other geographic features. If you transmit or provide the GIS Data (or any portion of it) to another user, the GIS Data must include a copy of this disclaimer.
Ordering Instructions
Online Linkage None available

Section 7 Metadata Reference
Metadata Date 05/19/2011
Contact Person Information ,


,  
Phone:
Email:
Metadata Standard Name Minnesota Geographic Metadata Guidelines
Metadata Standard Version 1.2
Metadata Standard Online Linkage http://www.gis.state.mn.us/stds/metadata.htm


This page last updated: 05/19/2011
Go back to top